{"id":"W4309570150","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102186","title":"Evaluating the quality of municipal strategic plans","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Strategic planning; Scope (computer science); Process management; Business; Quality (philosophy); Plan (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Local government; Strategic human resource planning; Process (computing); Public administration; Marketing; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04837275,0.000508912,0.001019288,0.004739432,0.00131993,0.00700615,0.001397409,0.001022965,0.003779602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2506393,0.0005069455,0.0005376606,0.009010102,0.001708012,0.003946288,0.002061368,0.001422186,0.0002969645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01702505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02833653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1062903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1288377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9422724,0.03738058,0.002928637,0.001285669,0.01395221,0.002180521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7773426,0.1347229,0.02711865,0.01085031,0.04560566,0.004360016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001926355,0.0008807957,0.5026597,0.001037697,0.001082929,0.0001261972,0.003734525,0.1380497,0.0005596073,0.05015341,0.01320046,0.2865886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008540867,0.003377608,0.5875645,0.001244274,0.001220262,0.0001191147,0.02267337,0.2819715,0.005604612,0.06157951,0.03360794,0.0001831332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455888,0.001444778,0.01087479,0.004857754,0.00009925289,0.0006100893,0.001565333,0.0002231085,0.03473599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916295,0.0004366275,0.005954505,0.0000755391,0.00001771141,0.00008757494,0.0008371007,0.00001978374,0.0009415372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6252687998258292,"score_gpt":0.6481470406014327,"score_spread":0.02287824077560352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}