{"id":"W4309859209","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2022.2146936","title":"Progressive selection and the erosion of Canadian environmental governance: evidence from elite interviews","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Politics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental governance; Corporate governance; Status quo; Elite; Transformative learning; Politics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental impact assessment; Articulation (sociology); Environmental studies; Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002644768,0.0001329617,0.0002510901,0.000103409,0.0003036131,0.00002498905,0.0001970588,0.00004320062,0.002359608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001921111,0.000139024,0.0000824653,0.0000676011,0.0002780053,0.0001810966,0.0002010236,0.0001837936,0.00009092654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007982124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001076294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04501446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00004231402,0.0004260735,0.0002799664,0.0000479085,0.0002824639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992664,0.00007933762,0.0003341413,0.0002105227,5.899826e-7,0.0001089929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004193765,0.0009055922,0.5790301,0.000113443,0.0003823294,0.00002258984,0.0493255,0.0007888878,0.004278729,0.3543177,0.003842632,0.006573122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004955094,0.0005321675,0.7312994,0.0001718246,0.0001150505,0.0001171901,0.008228665,0.01850672,0.002608237,0.1100699,0.122024,0.001371797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802059,0.0126867,0.00001827414,0.001280908,0.0001883959,0.0002795547,0.004330121,0.000005599043,0.001004574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923443,0.006500027,0.00009262375,0.0005063211,0.0001057795,0.00006742258,0.00009295509,0.00002019055,0.0002703801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2442478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04558217795336073,"score_gpt":0.2112781960503224,"score_spread":0.1656960180969617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}