{"id":"W4310635304","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.11.006","title":"KAMRA presbyopic inlay refractive outcomes: a Canadian perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inlay; Presbyopia; Visual acuity; Medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Cohort; Optometry; Patient satisfaction; Ophthalmology; Surgery; Dentistry; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002420621,0.0007632061,0.001240239,0.00463265,0.003500943,0.003865245,0.001642057,0.00120543,0.007580368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008509279,0.0003183563,0.001055624,0.01074137,0.001399498,0.00122453,0.001182219,0.00330632,0.0005393153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03600409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08439466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972132,0.0001800801,0.000225191,0.00020349,0.001285083,0.0008930417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867672,0.000847606,0.001732017,0.0001478164,0.008162619,0.002342724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001693127,0.0007075541,0.4865558,0.008165763,0.002644092,0.002104621,0.005588911,0.001065744,0.001105645,0.03355694,0.1977253,0.2590864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003588032,0.0004431342,0.8553511,0.01321008,0.002734604,0.00125609,0.01151526,0.0004043508,0.0003631664,0.002606763,0.1114674,0.0002892136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2482246,0.4132133,0.0003206832,0.1565146,0.002878946,0.0001788749,0.02753501,0.00005746797,0.1510766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6844432,0.2884005,0.001098399,0.01290265,0.002058706,0.00008990889,0.006380271,0.00004170014,0.004584722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03600409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2612291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04117213642901633,"score_gpt":0.3561051355806529,"score_spread":0.3149329991516366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}