{"id":"W4310960902","doi":"10.1002/eap.2783","title":"Applying stochastic and Bayesian integral projection modeling to amphibian population viability analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Reserve System, University of California; University of California, Davis; Bureau of Reclamation; California Department of Transportation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Population viability analysis; Threatened species; Population; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity; Biology; Climate change; Habitat; Bayesian probability; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Statistics; Endangered species; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002286864,0.00007766323,0.00011124,0.00005742508,0.0006470961,0.00002856373,0.0001102455,0.00003100923,0.02077933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002884396,0.00007365963,0.00005312315,0.001037719,0.00003466251,0.00005169286,0.0002583088,0.0001106794,0.00009403882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007230257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002593211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003264761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00108637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990968,0.00004946212,0.0001699094,0.0003542499,0.0001678728,0.0001617425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996638,0.0000318289,0.00004162732,0.0001564069,0.000007509486,0.00009887417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005232499,0.001083149,0.3947378,0.000009603168,0.00006764622,7.74192e-7,0.0004484925,0.5646139,0.001798995,0.0108364,0.0006252525,0.0257256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001164612,0.00008657038,0.6612834,3.66416e-7,0.00008912057,0.000003091465,0.001736518,0.3309885,0.000004452226,0.002619426,0.002872847,0.0001992585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703045,0.000002545184,0.2262606,0.0005893482,0.00002036435,0.001270516,0.00006368101,0.00008524229,0.001403144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993164,6.052392e-7,0.0005725261,0.0002593646,0.00001155206,0.005728615,0.0002073998,0.000003717596,0.00005222707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2665455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02555171503880566,"score_gpt":0.2678851250517649,"score_spread":0.2423334100129592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}