{"id":"W4310964086","doi":"10.11124/jbies-22-00224","title":"Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Systematic review; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Management science; Process management; MEDLINE; Medicine; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8196935,0.005970341,0.01488788,0.05553574,0.009221024,0.05659381,0.01291349,0.03057292,0.002182642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8581547,0.006588011,0.01416455,0.0236244,0.07125812,0.05278947,0.03298058,0.0546012,0.00181908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03325186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0853152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005784559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006298232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1114601,0.6946625,0.1257311,0.008516882,0.05689028,0.002739083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05343845,0.7921338,0.04074737,0.02148616,0.0888387,0.003355513],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004532734,0.0001735509,0.001645607,0.06946523,0.002855706,0.0006235301,0.04295117,0.003700495,0.001433296,0.4700272,0.05901283,0.3476581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005903687,0.0003827591,0.0008820055,0.09549906,0.00167964,0.0009333981,0.005417138,0.006937644,0.00113332,0.7708917,0.1146708,0.0009821783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007910956,0.09672464,0.5747117,0.3012117,0.01709127,0.004062138,0.0001800176,0.0007107558,0.0045166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01448596,0.02920328,0.9177611,0.02325107,0.007691125,0.006978376,0.00007931129,0.0002291379,0.0003206127],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.688915991658202,"score_gpt":0.6087825016231361,"score_spread":0.08013349003506598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}