{"id":"W4311200002","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.017","title":"A Comparison of Alternative Network Meta-Analysis Methods in the Presence of Nonproportional Hazards: A Case Study in First-Line Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MD Precision (Canada)","funders":"Bristol-Myers Squibb","keywords":"Hazard ratio; Proportional hazards model; Hazard; Medicine; Survival analysis; Event (particle physics); Randomized controlled trial; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Oncology; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09190842,0.002086225,0.004930189,0.002922713,0.0006461953,0.002684651,0.001920597,0.00230934,0.002217435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1795028,0.0007328507,0.019308,0.002190021,0.000601585,0.002173007,0.001287413,0.002192511,0.000161929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002095454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001804658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005050384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9027876,0.09048208,0.002492019,0.002175364,0.00172315,0.0003398682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.792234,0.1962918,0.004306188,0.004367739,0.002479443,0.0003208146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02811056,0.0003998192,0.0422027,0.0535607,0.6137708,0.001970859,0.000572002,0.07787763,0.001306993,0.01232542,0.003716865,0.1641856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01126529,0.004614011,0.02213979,0.01201971,0.6962759,0.001844442,0.0005084208,0.1899882,0.001608239,0.04723227,0.01212527,0.0003784696],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2211088,0.4696587,0.2866917,0.008450751,0.001182557,0.004273803,0.002639591,0.0004050234,0.005588984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452979,0.03823304,0.1103151,0.001529437,0.0003247318,0.002614401,0.0008394322,0.000119974,0.0007260414],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.486064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8342556377342246,"score_gpt":0.6213187337870495,"score_spread":0.2129369039471751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}