{"id":"W4312533594","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-86188","title":"A Review of Constraint Effects on Fracture Toughness for Structural Integrity Assessment in Fitness-for-Service Codes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kinectrics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Structural integrity; Fracture toughness; Structural engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Reliability engineering; Fracture (geology); Brittleness; Service (business); Toughness; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Materials science; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002287432,0.00113773,0.002034754,0.007095313,0.0003431299,0.00115167,0.00140988,0.001289628,0.003183511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003995765,0.0007353496,0.001056121,0.006496632,0.0006805673,0.001697128,0.0007426083,0.0009270961,0.001194294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008673568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002211727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003753998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003748822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988276,0.0001726818,0.0002427527,0.0001925606,0.0005196703,0.00004474477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958802,0.002505313,0.0004438533,0.00009050019,0.00102443,0.00005564394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107988,0.00006728585,0.000334607,0.07234681,0.0001606922,0.00009186287,0.0001124852,0.0008201935,0.00157533,0.003175217,0.01265053,0.908604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016333,0.0003183558,0.003159117,0.03207205,0.0007007812,0.0008532494,0.0001547869,0.0004459225,0.002905407,0.001713124,0.9575701,0.00009083268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000216585,0.998487,0.0003627358,0.00008652976,0.0001040685,0.0000107199,0.00003994132,0.000007352623,0.0006850344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001435052,0.9973816,0.000623367,0.00008656595,0.00007193878,0.00001474736,0.00006027535,0.00000494849,0.0003214791],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007095313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01209724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0308957476496287,"score_gpt":0.3440553214627036,"score_spread":0.3131595738130749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}