{"id":"W4312639785","doi":"10.30699/mmlj17.5.2.61","title":"In-vitro Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity Activity of the PAD4 Antigen of Bacillus anthracis as a vaccine candidate","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Medical Laboratory Journal","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Razi University","keywords":"Bacillus anthracis; Cytotoxicity; Microbiology; In vitro; Antigen; Anthrax vaccines; Antibacterial activity; Biology; Bacillus (shape); Anthrax toxin; Chemistry; Bacteria; Immunology; Immunization; Biochemistry; Recombinant DNA; Fusion protein; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002802112,0.00009411378,0.000229558,0.00003970174,0.0001570486,0.00000843644,0.0003635146,0.0001016129,0.0003523522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734223,0.00005896885,0.00007755582,0.0002150077,0.0001934839,0.000009295801,0.0003914399,0.0003570648,1.015186e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003691718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001220884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006254116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005782839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972655,0.0009334523,0.0003357521,0.000158853,0.00113352,0.0001729173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.00002469945,0.0002994777,0.0002704915,0.0003309054,0.0000923201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008238915,0.0001267232,0.003762591,0.00001942168,0.00003900924,0.000002391867,0.0001398684,0.00003076218,0.9887662,0.000004027216,0.00005949688,0.006225621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001821094,0.0001711208,0.05255797,0.00002277329,0.00002412028,0.00003918344,0.00003618644,0.00110857,0.9433414,0.0001434067,0.0006622054,0.00007199991],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982039,0.0004691274,0.00006707061,0.0004539035,0.0003269271,0.0002004923,0.0002389202,6.285762e-7,0.00003908115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995412,0.0002228892,0.00001023749,0.00008415704,0.0001150808,0.000005433999,0.000003518599,0.000008673076,0.000008761854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04879538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.385801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055922800400204,"score_gpt":0.2819059780391319,"score_spread":0.2713467500351299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}