{"id":"W4312639785","doi":"10.30699/mmlj17.5.2.61","title":"In-vitro Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity Activity of the PAD4 Antigen of Bacillus anthracis as a vaccine candidate","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Medical Laboratory Journal","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Razi University","keywords":"Bacillus anthracis; Cytotoxicity; Microbiology; In vitro; Antigen; Anthrax vaccines; Antibacterial activity; Biology; Bacillus (shape); Anthrax toxin; Chemistry; Bacteria; Immunology; Immunization; Biochemistry; Recombinant DNA; Fusion protein; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003977203,0.0004526134,0.0002930477,0.0001661327,0.0001300838,0.000198878,0.0001953332,0.0002713193,0.001525799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002353469,0.0001068229,0.0003048056,0.0002128875,0.0001228899,0.000196802,0.0002006606,0.0005479706,0.0004481697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001285604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001546089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003071457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003023357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997315,0.00009634588,0.00002448727,0.00003029946,0.00007163957,0.00004576898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997752,0.00009024663,0.00003543812,0.00002019296,0.00005635729,0.00002262203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002668835,0.0003136833,0.0003522608,0.000135382,0.00001063062,0.00003098131,0.00002003485,0.0002744417,0.9971675,0.00003971742,0.00003995711,0.001348612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003495322,0.006503032,0.002470148,0.00001399973,0.00003409472,0.000125194,0.00003128815,0.0008449457,0.9889262,0.00004076123,0.0009698863,0.000005570956],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956403,0.001970337,0.0009486816,0.00004547153,0.00005467006,0.00003827079,0.0002129829,0.00001038266,0.00107886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936376,0.001153522,0.001857667,0.00003902504,0.00003382619,0.00005471699,0.001098996,0.00000610901,0.002118528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001525799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005104303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055922800400204,"score_gpt":0.2819059780391319,"score_spread":0.2713467500351299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}