{"id":"W4312810435","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.14135","title":"INFORMING TEAM DYNAMICS OF CAPSTONE PROJECTS USING PEER EVALUATION SCORES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Capstone; Teamwork; Interpersonal communication; Set (abstract data type); Peer evaluation; Peer assessment; Quality (philosophy); Team composition; Empirical research; Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Higher education; Mathematics; Management; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137065,0.0006848694,0.0006942542,0.007564816,0.0009389154,0.002461878,0.0008290088,0.0004736114,0.002021977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07391321,0.0002261239,0.0003428182,0.003229782,0.0007200667,0.001959002,0.00204651,0.0007292677,0.0005718793],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000916842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001265661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002028836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003682284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849858,0.005979541,0.001248494,0.001191221,0.005947204,0.0006477592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9187572,0.03938814,0.0130664,0.003156103,0.02240716,0.003225032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006679378,0.0005459442,0.5599406,0.0003055823,0.0001827601,0.0002214434,0.01079968,0.01026837,0.008614555,0.002595751,0.001970189,0.4038872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005501736,0.001887867,0.8480908,0.000136589,0.0001291355,0.0002979259,0.0152003,0.1064432,0.01816115,0.003980854,0.00536235,0.0002549152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325923,0.0001260022,0.05627856,0.0001365093,0.00005048495,0.000369431,0.0002844016,0.0003035601,0.009858796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848262,0.00005555365,0.01350156,0.000007243133,0.00001789051,0.0001559844,0.0002291134,0.00002908404,0.001177373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07248777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02128554250526009,"score_gpt":0.2457934379280398,"score_spread":0.2245078954227797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}