{"id":"W4313166814","doi":"10.5751/es-13547-270413","title":"A method for benchmarking two different resilience assessment methods","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Australian Government","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Computer science; Benchmarking; Variance (accounting); Estimation; Preparedness; Econometrics; Bayesian probability; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Environmental science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04159492,0.001797374,0.001477602,0.009026548,0.00177872,0.006109772,0.00354343,0.003908742,0.01820643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1508263,0.001046014,0.002130758,0.007081791,0.002032892,0.005299552,0.006613046,0.003440753,0.005632217],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002890936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004345985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003703788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002824201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9417311,0.0279028,0.004962294,0.004489057,0.01965612,0.001258644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9306601,0.02901682,0.003595543,0.01582828,0.01981124,0.001088034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005191182,0.0004539215,0.00742749,0.001105029,0.0004615288,0.000349638,0.001376533,0.05813172,0.00935686,0.2852606,0.02640009,0.6091574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003128673,0.0006487942,0.009307085,0.001455077,0.0003436105,0.001175077,0.001351945,0.4905366,0.02098649,0.3003013,0.1730358,0.000545389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003651144,0.0002366497,0.9820041,0.0004184864,0.0003648577,0.0006010752,0.000699905,0.001989191,0.01003458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0624876,0.0002135303,0.9285651,0.0002369953,0.00009198217,0.002218444,0.0010997,0.0009702402,0.004116449],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2199776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02458807620436429,"score_gpt":0.4289588681793168,"score_spread":0.4043707919749525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}