{"id":"W4313397947","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2022.12.012","title":"Optimizing effective dose and image quality in cone beam CT sialography","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto","keywords":"Sialography; Cone beam ct; Cone beam computed tomography; Image quality; Cone (formal languages); Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Radiology; Image (mathematics); Computer science; Computed tomography; Artificial intelligence; Internal medicine; Salivary gland; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278308,0.000585329,0.0004322302,0.0007587423,0.0002056755,0.001431594,0.0004563225,0.0008078892,0.001641038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005328216,0.0005807151,0.0004837469,0.0005476562,0.0002771047,0.000818461,0.0007737855,0.0005456702,0.0003432897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005562707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008738617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002112267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00271754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999139,0.0002466063,0.00007141558,0.0000854268,0.0004005403,0.00005701843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975447,0.001523461,0.0002650286,0.0001313217,0.0004358456,0.00009965176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002759775,0.000375415,0.03439806,0.000655779,0.00018535,0.0004491115,0.0004259965,0.07626288,0.6566117,0.001869347,0.001096929,0.2249098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002269453,0.001401943,0.09253228,0.0002274024,0.0005537218,0.003946404,0.0003332773,0.3556833,0.5377814,0.002533998,0.00455717,0.0002222003],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3808024,0.00582641,0.6051285,0.0005832089,0.00005573386,0.0002631455,0.0003637973,0.001252577,0.005724216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7292337,0.001764399,0.2658997,0.0002082878,0.00003715684,0.00008357483,0.0002338669,0.0009499133,0.001589462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002112267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006760418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02145913665091418,"score_gpt":0.3058659275313241,"score_spread":0.2844067908804099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}