{"id":"W4315796166","doi":"10.1186/s12940-022-00930-3","title":"A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; University of California, San Francisco","keywords":"Scientific consensus; Hazard; Agency (philosophy); Business; Uncertainty; Risk assessment; Population; Scientific evidence; Environmental health; Public health; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Global warming; Climate change; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2706543,0.004302228,0.006956371,0.01357392,0.01050071,0.03083211,0.01732327,0.05812687,0.009533835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2389601,0.003197513,0.007094695,0.01071985,0.02017262,0.04587786,0.02918878,0.07346276,0.005322041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03477326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1746672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01152697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01002108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8514516,0.08248505,0.0200068,0.009021068,0.02985981,0.007175529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6358669,0.1908161,0.01583032,0.01033105,0.1171161,0.03003952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009944998,0.0002989874,0.0006985712,0.01078615,0.0002696618,0.0006273485,0.005391804,0.004660878,0.0005028504,0.3217021,0.4842458,0.1707164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006385889,0.00006972659,0.0003097643,0.03013443,0.0001176172,0.0002161627,0.004322506,0.001836616,0.0002179044,0.3965774,0.5659819,0.0001522502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002389238,0.04200267,0.01348606,0.9317302,0.008896647,0.0002598452,0.0001626305,0.000101307,0.003121854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03087499,0.1724063,0.208057,0.5433574,0.03055126,0.004410459,0.001864278,0.0003848347,0.008093437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1217274243078955,"score_gpt":0.4545730270650029,"score_spread":0.3328456027571074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}