{"id":"W4316092844","doi":"10.18356/9789210010641c012","title":"Case concerning legality of use of force (Yugoslavia v. Canada) (provisional measures) order of 2 June 1999","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009509329,0.0002900552,0.0002811679,0.0009914605,0.008320557,0.00440234,0.001256271,0.003914336,0.006763127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001439248,0.0004126476,0.000419819,0.00148895,0.003170956,0.000689719,0.001341391,0.004251261,0.0009041797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03154513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04441462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9450855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985268,0.0001407974,0.00004331332,0.0001025481,0.00056223,0.0006242607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995578,0.0001128315,0.00002356837,0.00002279765,0.0002067,0.00007624209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005244635,0.00005464564,0.002712228,0.00009123954,0.00001656886,0.001306837,0.007016746,0.0006025182,0.0006853709,0.5447737,0.4242244,0.01846336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003674538,0.00001937081,0.01313134,0.000388442,0.00003171815,0.0003255105,0.003602205,0.0003266717,0.0006758838,0.01077165,0.9706265,0.00006391089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02703086,0.01066664,0.0005675376,0.02300366,0.001019777,0.0001676419,0.001629963,0.0000653143,0.9358485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2940592,0.005741606,0.001204116,0.02064456,0.0001824014,0.0001348295,0.0007278012,0.00003902455,0.6772664],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05491453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.228877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04947787858311621,"score_gpt":0.2764742265397515,"score_spread":0.2269963479566353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}