{"id":"W4317548775","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119569","title":"Evidence-based decision-making: On the use of systematicity cases to check the compliance of reviews with reporting guidelines such as PRISMA 2020","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Guideline; Certification; Quality (philosophy); Quality assurance; Computer science; Trustworthiness; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Process management; Knowledge management; MEDLINE; Medicine; Business; Political science; Engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8836306,0.006561057,0.01657676,0.04085476,0.009175316,0.03777637,0.01911119,0.04388937,0.008266386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9389206,0.008550247,0.0186997,0.02612319,0.03817566,0.06366654,0.03351743,0.02574785,0.004180475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02020342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07838558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004438061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003563337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.04644192,0.7604924,0.1337145,0.01230873,0.04529488,0.001747645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02335489,0.8494298,0.04532451,0.03943728,0.04010843,0.002345034],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002177081,0.0003965573,0.004735298,0.07969649,0.007685272,0.002523195,0.03257941,0.006262474,0.001243436,0.495468,0.06748246,0.2997504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003412084,0.0006517314,0.001342062,0.1569722,0.003255449,0.001295688,0.003259828,0.02235178,0.00314352,0.6393433,0.1638602,0.001112212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005741127,0.03123869,0.6836203,0.1729084,0.01075766,0.06978878,0.001433502,0.002017298,0.02249437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05622192,0.006904366,0.8531799,0.01951559,0.001408625,0.06112253,0.0005300874,0.0002647055,0.0008522539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1163694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3134951760922504,"score_gpt":0.3741838087340318,"score_spread":0.06068863264178143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}