{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778232,0.00006371345,0.0001013798,0.0003112555,0.0009940959,0.0007631297,0.000733344,0.00005403471,0.0008282847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002635057,0.00006491564,0.00004311618,0.001625249,0.0001610022,0.001575339,0.00001723093,0.0003375865,0.0003418791],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005880302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07154269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4790519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988166,0.0001441066,0.0002679374,0.00009719409,0.000319849,0.0003542852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.0003943363,0.0001728636,0.0001285711,0.0005831463,0.0008126135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674277,0.000007099415,0.001300515,0.000009137466,0.00001264127,0.00008886424,0.02684384,0.0000956855,0.00005324405,0.8298209,0.1394576,0.002305854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004849235,0.00001793838,0.002905949,0.00005356,0.00002322608,0.00001000423,0.004129824,0.000002328569,0.00004425235,0.006129304,0.9865469,0.0000881844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511806,0.0001989728,0.0006046243,0.3450174,0.007406373,0.0002412672,0.00001798982,0.00005414583,0.5613411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890905,0.00004530236,0.0002433479,0.007709204,0.000841866,0.000003242924,7.703485e-7,0.000008530346,0.002057257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1130655748367023,"score_gpt":0.4468874587633919,"score_spread":0.3338218839266895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}