{"id":"W4319233956","doi":"10.1007/s11572-023-09656-w","title":"The Human Right to Adequate Social Inclusion: A Reply to Critics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Human rights; Philosophy of law; Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Argumentative; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001081984,0.0001434246,0.0001655092,0.00005921907,0.01045181,0.0001774641,0.0004140934,0.0001264621,0.00003919846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002874722,0.0001141713,0.00008197841,0.0003918754,0.0009074614,0.0001074383,0.0006356816,0.0002875545,0.0003036182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005284669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006454963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001570033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004900009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980886,0.0002122959,0.0002307569,0.0003049601,0.0005516413,0.0006117238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986708,0.0004538595,0.0000276401,0.0002048976,0.0001401219,0.0005027442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002281364,0.00001924765,0.000004028976,0.00002019621,0.000007987816,0.00002691527,0.02824541,3.343355e-7,0.00003356811,0.9672517,0.003994018,0.0003738461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005915095,0.00007940298,0.00007539977,0.00001711429,0.00002153352,6.490807e-7,0.0006322098,8.643778e-7,0.00003426253,0.6563302,0.342626,0.0001231879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03764883,0.00006348628,0.00001442798,0.4102191,0.0004827913,0.0002636513,0.00003288322,0.0001664453,0.5511084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516184,0.00001074039,0.00003412543,0.04434905,0.003048555,0.00003369679,0.000005005891,0.00001522193,0.0008851922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1048353922726079,"score_gpt":0.3841607824119783,"score_spread":0.2793253901393705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}