{"id":"W4319294697","doi":"10.1037/xge0001369","title":"Two kinds of counterfactual closeness.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Closeness; Disappointment; Surprise; Odds; Counterfactual conditional; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104053,0.0002202121,0.0005090021,0.000687759,0.00007097347,0.00001131117,0.0003949851,0.0002254604,0.005942927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000224914,0.000199043,0.0003128074,0.0005164748,0.0004043353,0.0001134043,0.00005055032,0.0004463118,0.0008085291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004269171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000294756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001264282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001981861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976559,0.0003181874,0.001002854,0.0003089809,0.0003069831,0.0004070682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00007236515,0.0006776521,0.0004031711,0.000147122,0.0001618326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002063945,0.00103727,0.003459655,0.000003936301,0.0004763264,0.0002988593,0.003876328,0.00004256724,0.7024921,0.005013308,0.2732251,0.008010627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05095504,0.0163285,0.2456468,0.0001041234,0.0002230766,0.01755813,0.0218978,0.0001243621,0.3296188,0.005455835,0.3102835,0.001804032],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338352,0.0006630675,0.0003337458,0.0004261651,0.01377976,0.00009577164,0.00001295143,0.00005157336,0.05080177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939327,0.00004135736,0.0005094363,0.001717041,0.0009158342,0.00001000406,0.000007332073,0.00003704293,0.002829276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3728733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0604020293408214,"score_gpt":0.4415080365913492,"score_spread":0.3811060072505278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}