{"id":"W4319337725","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2022-0022","title":"Competitive interactions between invasive round goby and native white sucker in streams","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Catostomus; Round goby; Sucker; Neogobius; Biology; Goby; Ecology; Trophic level; Benthic zone; Fishery; Interspecific competition; Predation; Tributary; Zoology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003596992,0.0001864009,0.0002862353,0.0003647559,0.0008264884,0.0008550525,0.0002706915,0.0003031621,0.001481411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001261714,0.0001619456,0.0001627903,0.0002024786,0.000577933,0.0002717374,0.0005914098,0.0002893498,0.00009086468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001329747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009426249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09926322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4547659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997099,0.00008184144,0.00001411382,0.00004165431,0.00005812544,0.0000943964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.0001616792,0.0001716292,0.00001565312,0.00005047226,0.0003761916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002783561,0.0001811146,0.9914028,0.0000129432,0.00006337682,0.0003910596,0.001777237,0.00007924121,0.002940051,0.00004825724,0.00008578295,0.00273976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005821754,0.000121776,0.9967936,0.000003859963,0.0000168024,0.00008621609,0.002485291,0.0003164897,0.0000579382,0.00002071832,0.00008791815,0.00000364975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998971,0.000009958909,0.000002598529,0.000004947883,2.907123e-7,6.248083e-7,0.000002654938,2.230599e-7,0.00008169253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998117,0.00001356509,0.00001459852,0.000008522836,6.458476e-7,0.000001626972,0.00001167296,2.084988e-7,0.000137509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09926322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1973709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02296318545675207,"score_gpt":0.2374537777957982,"score_spread":0.2144905923390461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}