{"id":"W4319789818","doi":"10.1111/aje.13122","title":"Modelling the current and future distribution of <i>Caesalpinia bonduc</i> (L.) Roxb: Its implication for future conservation of the species in the Southern Benin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Barley","funders":"Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Caesalpinia; Habitat; Conservation status; Evapotranspiration; Species distribution; Geography; Representative Concentration Pathways; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Agroforestry; Climate change; Environmental science; Biology; General Circulation Model","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006380124,0.00006635,0.0001300573,0.00001987663,0.0001096652,0.000009349202,0.0002598129,0.00004326057,0.0001678533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004697421,0.00003413871,0.00007005097,0.0003731798,0.0001667123,0.00005895278,0.00005254525,0.0001399376,0.000003512661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008888439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001928507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001394229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001576104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992076,0.0001052376,0.0003188018,0.00007960947,0.0001580935,0.0001307188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992054,0.0001577129,0.0004447165,0.0001165985,0.00005638278,0.00001923849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001065079,0.001273373,0.4952268,0.000314407,0.000200736,0.000005875608,0.08101086,0.02157727,0.05836814,0.12384,0.1863202,0.03079732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004926074,0.0001605742,0.8608518,0.00001142707,0.00004263215,0.00001665534,0.03838717,0.002285779,0.0005021408,0.00133725,0.09584092,0.00007108897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752538,0.0001595423,0.0001192767,0.02364146,0.0002352642,0.0002276126,0.0002206117,0.000002423232,0.0001400665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993085,0.0004074903,0.000007997287,0.00008584658,0.0001277464,0.00001268428,0.00002994996,0.000003547456,0.00001628893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.365625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1837876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03577476525087172,"score_gpt":0.254995517591222,"score_spread":0.2192207523403502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}