{"id":"W4319982399","doi":"10.17762/de.vol2023iss1.9761","title":"Delineation of drainage potential area using geospatial techniques: A case study in the Indravati River Basin of India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Engineering","topic":"Groundwater and Watershed Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structural basin; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed; Terrain; Groundwater recharge; Geology; Vegetation (pathology); Drainage; Geospatial analysis; Topographic map (neuroanatomy); Channel (broadcasting); Remote sensing; Geomorphology; Groundwater; Geography; Cartography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513358,0.0001828634,0.0001200959,0.001623142,0.0007089535,0.0008781758,0.0005981207,0.0003218162,0.0006655996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006948102,0.0001353238,0.0002703691,0.002500474,0.0007238518,0.0003703363,0.0005297781,0.0002383091,0.0000662932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001189267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008247099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06711037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2019027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997894,0.00008563811,0.00001319495,0.0000243922,0.00004804366,0.00003936057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996095,0.0002083144,0.00005758631,0.0000345377,0.00005420697,0.00003589558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001879747,0.0005216996,0.7967023,0.0003492701,0.00008661475,0.03769466,0.01995178,0.03713454,0.009662307,0.008003427,0.002269208,0.08743627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002161881,0.000231717,0.8416064,0.00009818807,0.00009358973,0.005444911,0.07259776,0.0656169,0.004359854,0.002156828,0.007689185,0.00008302494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971765,0.00004455215,0.0007736825,0.00008327399,0.000001586295,0.00003061697,0.0001594438,0.00001499559,0.001715387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977801,0.00007195902,0.001695548,0.000008469966,0.000001247422,0.00001090146,0.00007819373,0.000003192947,0.0003503919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06711037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1334395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02402823000228492,"score_gpt":0.2323388202071407,"score_spread":0.2083105902048557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}