{"id":"W4320925302","doi":"10.5751/ace-02357-180104","title":"Using Breeding Bird Survey and eBird data to improve marsh bird monitoring abundance indices and trends","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Avian Conservation and Ecology","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Government of Ontario; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation","keywords":"Marsh; Breeding bird survey; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Population; Citizen science; Bird conservation; Survey methodology; Biology; Wetland; Demography; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005583332,0.00009411661,0.0001245331,0.0001006075,0.0002134525,0.00007655579,0.0001179674,0.0000519994,0.00003664966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005520351,0.00009201105,0.000005688106,0.0003229103,0.00009573634,0.0002682312,0.0005289599,0.00005593578,0.00003871609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002304853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003788235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00304502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008583646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991462,0.00004860878,0.0001437424,0.0003690098,0.00008035268,0.0002121348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995743,0.0001147055,0.00005559584,0.0001575207,0.000004713895,0.00009316702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009451076,0.00000560149,0.9698283,0.000009844601,0.000008212588,0.000004300825,0.0001675421,0.00001217219,0.001261437,0.000009936045,0.001079169,0.02760404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002493462,0.00005629013,0.9904414,0.000009077869,0.000008765775,0.000003679168,0.0001443504,0.005740583,0.00001259223,0.00004693047,0.00317767,0.0001093402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972376,0.00002534459,0.00004637581,0.002164429,0.0002351086,0.00009592334,0.00001834512,0.00008132083,0.00009559306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980171,0.0001555672,0.0006365004,0.0007527401,0.00005010492,0.000006601974,0.00001177707,0.0000158586,0.0003537439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0274947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4789876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1120073783581,"score_gpt":0.3138542077238171,"score_spread":0.2018468293657171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}