{"id":"W4321095154","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01042","title":"A meta‐analysis of shrub density as a predictor of animal abundance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Shrub; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Relative species abundance; Shrubland","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027384,0.00007733504,0.000464987,0.00009494033,0.00005491169,8.658203e-7,0.0001372808,0.00008414549,0.0005841658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008596836,0.00006281336,0.0002270347,0.0007110111,0.0005128107,0.00003114283,0.0001708416,0.00004923821,0.0001128087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001473057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008467713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001995393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008825174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.00009062372,0.0002290255,0.0002078927,0.00007012818,0.0001535444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.0002009194,0.0001480542,0.0001503161,0.0000150463,0.00002906286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003992516,0.00004340733,0.9722787,0.000006457527,0.01832725,0.000001799956,0.0004083233,0.0006997101,0.004596623,0.003272884,0.0003044268,0.00002052865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001044621,0.0001992477,0.983907,5.448032e-7,0.01045954,7.563151e-7,0.00004486148,0.003254001,0.0001638764,0.001446107,0.0003548363,0.00006474301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978985,0.0001077599,0.0001277637,0.0005350905,0.00004875053,0.00007239901,0.00003548788,0.0000274279,0.001146775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998998,0.00008021485,0.0002553858,0.0003003443,0.00000643254,0.00001510999,0.00001918726,0.000003132115,0.0003221367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01162836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03412665474587751,"score_gpt":0.2856716372556778,"score_spread":0.2515449825098003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}