{"id":"W4323315981","doi":"10.1007/s11783-023-1694-0","title":"Data quality assessment for studies investigating microplastics and nanoplastics in food products: Are current data reliable?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering","topic":"Microplastics and Plastic Pollution","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Microplastics; Reliability (semiconductor); Data quality; Environmental health; Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Protocol (science); Risk assessment; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Environmental chemistry; External quality assessment; Chemistry; Operations management; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.403632,0.001374905,0.004047929,0.01016558,0.002242456,0.01488562,0.008642928,0.00641817,0.003566143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6941378,0.001517789,0.00490871,0.01228585,0.008439596,0.01183551,0.005649605,0.004161839,0.001089447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00621188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0180643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01717323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01290184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6086429,0.1843274,0.097898,0.01544024,0.09075598,0.00293537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1013503,0.5604519,0.08861703,0.08062841,0.1654206,0.003531678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003953142,0.0006487645,0.4949,0.0403511,0.009051383,0.0004549873,0.007422897,0.006693499,0.00399293,0.03632611,0.03002987,0.3661753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001569877,0.003851774,0.3110324,0.08533494,0.0182764,0.001848233,0.01313083,0.02365997,0.0262603,0.1025522,0.4113803,0.001102643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1656178,0.1321317,0.4898174,0.0888003,0.003956988,0.0103637,0.07951438,0.001885929,0.02791197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149774,0.0270047,0.1968542,0.01536771,0.001258373,0.006804597,0.03562625,0.0005155019,0.001591314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.596368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7354279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07636580084922776,"score_gpt":0.3004069215115969,"score_spread":0.2240411206623691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}