{"id":"W4323322741","doi":"10.36941/jicd-2023-0002","title":"Re-Examining the Use of Inclusive Society as a Solution to Social Inequalities: It’s Time we Address the Elephants in the House","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Mainstream; Inclusion (mineral); Multiculturalism; Social integration; Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Social policy; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Social science; Law; Population; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002571762,0.00005686075,0.00009018797,0.000044531,0.0007027268,0.0001930576,0.0003438565,0.00003770672,0.00005425194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006805354,0.00003008517,0.00003595222,0.0003916463,0.0001255742,0.000301248,0.00008365181,0.0001171038,0.00001140528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000146418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005475356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007518318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004237694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983739,0.0002241212,0.0003540124,0.00007404097,0.000849441,0.0001244751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988653,0.0004564324,0.0002631914,0.00003515643,0.0003516366,0.00002826732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005404764,0.00004112582,0.001719811,0.000002989406,0.00004690848,0.000003446879,0.8666466,0.0004886866,0.0002314089,0.004656708,0.1183352,0.007773031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004836369,0.00008428503,0.07650579,0.0001149398,0.000008382784,0.000003994485,0.2350272,0.0008216909,0.0001344071,0.0002895483,0.6863882,0.0001379172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8171309,0.0000454637,0.0003423754,0.1810228,0.0004180516,0.0002303665,0.000007656296,0.00000906334,0.0007933198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935576,0.0004471552,0.0001890261,0.004328066,0.0003007515,0.00001065288,0.00000149627,0.000003647909,0.001161626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6316194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5404877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1607562412821716,"score_gpt":0.3844452739987951,"score_spread":0.2236890327166236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}