{"id":"W4323355869","doi":"10.5558/tfc2023-005","title":"Collaboration results in higher impact research: Case study of the Canadian Forest Service","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Government (linguistics); Citation; Service (business); Business; Citation impact; Impact factor; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Public administration; Environmental planning; Geography; Marketing; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03254639,0.0004980013,0.000754561,0.009537189,0.03135628,0.0114693,0.002249468,0.003041828,0.005029657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06804299,0.0002999876,0.000746131,0.0369917,0.006750701,0.005212435,0.01054309,0.002494997,0.0004347241],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07654406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.144954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8569707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9345848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9649532,0.01448014,0.001597795,0.001473684,0.0100427,0.007452431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8745809,0.06729366,0.00711702,0.004384899,0.02768746,0.01893615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003600269,0.001018789,0.2357293,0.00134056,0.0002318408,0.01148456,0.477687,0.001322792,0.0008985955,0.07444698,0.03710925,0.1583704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001154833,0.000262033,0.1625988,0.001471773,0.000180335,0.002324857,0.6323006,0.001202371,0.0007082858,0.009669327,0.1890134,0.0001527139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.805743,0.007473657,0.001576121,0.03169788,0.000216386,0.0005440925,0.00128531,0.00006944719,0.151394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877563,0.003180924,0.001916484,0.001638821,0.00007503288,0.0001233491,0.0003151789,0.00003932561,0.004954591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5553687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08721384600485198,"score_gpt":0.3520677871784472,"score_spread":0.2648539411735952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}