{"id":"W4323874708","doi":"10.5194/bg-6-225-2009","title":"Using MODIS derived fPAR with ground based flux tower measurements to derive the light use efficiency for two Canadian peatlands","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University)","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Trent University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Photosynthetically active radiation; Peat; Bog; Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Ombrotrophic; Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; Ecosystem; Geology; Physics; Botany; Ecology; Biology; Photosynthesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117616,0.000787741,0.0006225218,0.002084404,0.003063062,0.001266121,0.001113222,0.0004610443,0.0007183323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001509334,0.000466287,0.000717042,0.002239804,0.0006016596,0.0006116469,0.0005519813,0.0004819253,0.0001554886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01742887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995104,0.00002291233,0.00001973577,0.0001241505,0.0001786049,0.0001441207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993203,0.00008018651,0.00004191421,0.00003911621,0.0004162662,0.0001022681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00117184,0.0006398592,0.7986755,0.0002285634,0.0004473667,0.0007000492,0.003506119,0.02781275,0.08937964,0.0008257986,0.001506922,0.07510568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007092329,0.00005129522,0.9618884,0.00001827253,0.0001143577,0.00008091866,0.0008739857,0.02716066,0.007776701,0.0001086024,0.001796799,0.00005910343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977755,0.00005608826,0.0006139086,0.00001352705,0.000002984565,0.00002609777,0.0007335944,0.0000299541,0.0007483001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929678,0.0000565462,0.004928377,0.00001229156,0.000001549337,0.00003185717,0.001389336,0.00002061083,0.0005916132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01742887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1264559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02100536117071371,"score_gpt":0.197347925944824,"score_spread":0.1763425647741103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}