{"id":"W4324020940","doi":"10.1002/eap.2838","title":"Can morphological traits explain species‐specific differences in meta‐analyses? A case study of forest beetles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; University of Toronto; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Mitacs; University of Northern British Columbia; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Trait; Guild; Biology; Ecology; Null model; Meta-analysis; Type I and type II errors; Habitat; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08284288,0.003603386,0.008194755,0.005976363,0.001018765,0.004102624,0.003715568,0.002891288,0.003912413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1453581,0.001586396,0.05015381,0.005709691,0.0009989534,0.002250457,0.002264121,0.003464377,0.0004417879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001629298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001811842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005547292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007704479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.912905,0.06899872,0.006993976,0.008188371,0.002132055,0.0007819439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7859839,0.1890616,0.006738538,0.01378941,0.003591528,0.0008350815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001553086,0.00003860923,0.03024673,0.01844541,0.9321831,0.0006105336,0.0002268911,0.003922782,0.001062089,0.0007801761,0.00131414,0.009616362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005042608,0.0003737637,0.02043741,0.003620444,0.9555881,0.0003032829,0.000272211,0.008491584,0.0009961373,0.00453613,0.004775225,0.0001015318],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1664416,0.6200328,0.1898821,0.006888102,0.002275534,0.001427487,0.008370059,0.001908101,0.002774386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251766,0.02137611,0.04743278,0.001705631,0.0003060258,0.001111571,0.001917212,0.0004702372,0.0005038521],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2714187925266265,"score_gpt":0.3705250948392993,"score_spread":0.09910630231267276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}