{"id":"W4360976161","doi":"10.1080/08856257.2023.2195075","title":"Measuring collective efficacy for inclusion in a global context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Special Needs Education","topic":"Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Collective efficacy; Context (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Pedagogy; Internal consistency; Self-efficacy; Dimension (graph theory); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003828253,0.0002548302,0.0003601654,0.001576635,0.00109981,0.00175276,0.0002229051,0.0003523047,0.002580429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007231805,0.0001314804,0.0003838767,0.0007885243,0.00154676,0.000778399,0.003281425,0.0007083471,0.0001972443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005745841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000676115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003340577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982993,0.0008306899,0.0001055408,0.000167774,0.0003823621,0.0002143818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946181,0.001846598,0.001395803,0.0006212175,0.0007853378,0.0007329361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000141593,0.0006112789,0.8756452,0.0002625989,0.0001533759,0.0002003083,0.04345397,0.0005040638,0.003112416,0.003318084,0.0007431637,0.07185409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001304545,0.0003336782,0.9623691,0.0001277653,0.00006061787,0.0001287204,0.03064463,0.0003056428,0.0007317879,0.001213493,0.004050643,0.00002079759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862065,0.00007983488,0.0004967448,0.0001053635,0.00001184811,0.00004317004,0.00002296109,0.000007380094,0.01302616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.00004573723,0.0004148884,0.00001455734,0.000004889522,0.00003121921,0.0000239334,0.000002312816,0.0004112546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003828253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02024603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05766903240598489,"score_gpt":0.3502705693190496,"score_spread":0.2926015369130647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}