{"id":"W4360981126","doi":"10.1007/s12369-023-00968-4","title":"Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Social Robotics","topic":"Social Robot Interaction and HRI","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Uncanny valley; Uncanny; Diversity (politics); Robot; Robotics; Cognitive science; Human–robot interaction; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Communication; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2238541,0.00152497,0.009534416,0.033542,0.003604547,0.01093296,0.003764616,0.005405523,0.001535851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5045919,0.003285833,0.005273497,0.03863146,0.01160882,0.02059207,0.007645939,0.003954669,0.0003172256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01218184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05758912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01059105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5712016,0.2616502,0.1154509,0.01414708,0.03518006,0.002370106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3856402,0.4847549,0.07102713,0.01808271,0.03864819,0.001846864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002714754,0.00003379372,0.00494541,0.7833874,0.006347885,0.0005692047,0.01987803,0.0002884952,0.0006147033,0.008377531,0.008609829,0.1666763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001214897,0.0001681318,0.004015523,0.9213394,0.006990061,0.0005366578,0.01047674,0.0001561373,0.0003125647,0.006856113,0.04893263,0.00009453594],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003735189,0.9827854,0.002274701,0.008892431,0.0008536266,0.0007587976,0.0002059803,0.00001937706,0.0004744439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1050789,0.8562828,0.01876505,0.01301941,0.0008290457,0.005159895,0.0004231517,0.00007121277,0.0003705039],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4673649470112444,"score_gpt":0.5760411624325269,"score_spread":0.1086762154212825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}