{"id":"W4360981126","doi":"10.1007/s12369-023-00968-4","title":"Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Social Robotics","topic":"Social Robot Interaction and HRI","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Uncanny valley; Uncanny; Diversity (politics); Robot; Robotics; Cognitive science; Human–robot interaction; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Communication; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00382948,0.0003595557,0.002967524,0.001658346,0.0002188085,0.00007996336,0.001661042,0.0005024556,0.0005386139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001995804,0.0003313284,0.001487656,0.0008491336,0.0001841054,0.0002260594,0.0005770822,0.002312575,0.0003758747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005909747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004413443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001406282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921873,0.001836129,0.003217912,0.0003117725,0.00206954,0.0003773698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914834,0.00163588,0.003927526,0.0002482085,0.002588424,0.0001164975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002419295,0.001421564,0.00005757938,0.8719122,0.007918903,0.001275279,0.006870984,0.00003970097,0.000003849894,0.04770174,0.02718164,0.03537466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007825959,0.0002303134,0.0001263201,0.9358618,0.002067946,0.0004900798,0.002654952,0.000003648325,6.874177e-7,0.0006725789,0.05663934,0.0004697331],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002369227,0.9826284,0.0001725783,0.001417946,0.01044246,0.001340432,0.0001054346,0.00003420883,0.003834842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006139755,0.9934747,0.00006653458,0.0002280447,0.001553665,0.00003020915,0.0000484144,0.00007464819,0.003909829],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06394963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4673649470112444,"score_gpt":0.5760411624325269,"score_spread":0.1086762154212825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}