{"id":"W4362591828","doi":"","title":"THE EXPLOITATION OF THE TULGHEŞ-GRINŢIEŞ URANIUM DEPOSIT. BETWEEN BENEFITS AND CONTROVERSY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Uranium; Environmental science; Metallurgy; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001967222,0.0001665278,0.0002355554,0.0008631168,0.002920223,0.003497118,0.0005248517,0.00185034,0.003614874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003000558,0.0001623937,0.0002005348,0.000640759,0.006208458,0.002523409,0.003428543,0.002142048,0.0003881569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003160488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003136305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007239368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01657961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.0002718689,0.00005147877,0.0001541464,0.000528538,0.0002205133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991061,0.0003649745,0.000146184,0.0001059356,0.0001732008,0.0001035959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003288171,0.00004396894,0.01874636,0.000449949,0.00004586896,0.003837363,0.01451488,0.0003207753,0.004913471,0.7631145,0.0257654,0.1679187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002219363,0.0001137828,0.03655799,0.0008992824,0.00002980797,0.003702586,0.01735652,0.0002570369,0.002490107,0.08365444,0.8548624,0.00005389924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2725988,0.03232617,0.00213029,0.0728396,0.00110947,0.00004961343,0.0001464924,0.00003935604,0.6187602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940137,0.004524742,0.0009221653,0.007083077,0.0003392227,0.00002463046,0.00004888085,0.00002881608,0.04689148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0229311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.261004491696839,"score_gpt":0.5169867293157152,"score_spread":0.2559822376188762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}