{"id":"W4362683297","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.18.006","title":"Creating Logic Models Using Grounded Theory: A Case Example Demonstrating a Unique Approach to Logic Model Development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Health; University of Regina; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Logic model; Parallels; Computer science; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Theory; Management science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03253812,0.00021331,0.000332524,0.0007966804,0.0007613041,0.00068918,0.0003607585,0.0001141463,0.000226161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003184243,0.0001681472,0.0001084907,0.001071221,0.00006584022,0.0008821769,0.00001774589,0.0002669026,0.000008274726],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001002462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01113011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000646872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00750663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945899,0.001463294,0.00131956,0.0003645955,0.001787968,0.0004746818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952223,0.0003147022,0.0007872159,0.000308201,0.002635916,0.0007316361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001103926,0.0000658831,0.0006116449,0.000005881962,0.00002764071,0.00003148451,0.006021895,0.7592505,0.00004733658,0.06421748,0.00003613572,0.1696731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249441,0.000128112,0.0001527692,0.00003864321,0.00005301087,0.0008545106,0.005883161,0.8255775,0.00006713719,0.1664542,0.0001815304,0.0001844195],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3018133,0.0001160268,0.6816635,0.00008456192,0.0001222649,0.001180954,0.000002520698,0.00001131733,0.01500554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6296589,6.562184e-7,0.3699659,0.0002126771,0.00002778757,0.00006851188,0.000004137795,0.00001063088,0.00005075039],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3278456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7082610594770602,"score_gpt":0.5253019207443822,"score_spread":0.182959138732678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}