{"id":"W4362689335","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.16.004","title":"Accountability, Rationality, and New Structures of Governance: Making Room for Political Rationality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Rationality; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Bureaucracy; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Technocracy; Parliament; Mandate; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Public relations; Public administration; Positive economics; Law; Social science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03860897,0.0004157771,0.0006170739,0.001974634,0.00559973,0.01504658,0.001879423,0.004017196,0.003516693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03204595,0.0004527218,0.0006935426,0.001442192,0.07787363,0.01627436,0.007643233,0.007367227,0.0004635491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01331101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01621986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008445866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008006617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9700228,0.01936217,0.0007237573,0.00234633,0.004828784,0.002716112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526728,0.02885438,0.004029741,0.007008127,0.0045876,0.002847359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007011954,0.000007384857,0.000221321,0.00001352281,0.000004667028,0.00001339167,0.001144347,0.0005350917,0.00003432557,0.994652,0.0006498049,0.002717048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002271281,0.000009750018,0.0003146593,0.00006397009,0.000005840437,0.00001046695,0.0006412456,0.0009405048,0.00009014529,0.9817231,0.01616622,0.00001148692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08665797,0.005520474,0.1933123,0.2450099,0.001030201,0.0001621408,0.00007126332,0.0002372351,0.4679986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777002,0.0008349152,0.01279543,0.002767219,0.0003087234,0.0001123571,0.00002165725,0.00004817742,0.005411368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03860897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2041862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.518764035540208,"score_gpt":0.5838040393902938,"score_spread":0.06504000385008579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}