{"id":"W4363676698","doi":"10.1007/s10518-023-01676-0","title":"Residential building stock in Serbia: classification and vulnerability for seismic risk studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich","keywords":"Seismic risk; Fragility; Vulnerability assessment; Earthquake scenario; Stock (firearms); Vulnerability (computing); Seismic hazard; Urban seismic risk; Hazard; Risk assessment; Context (archaeology); Civil engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Forensic engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Geography; Business; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781675,0.0004224235,0.0002803403,0.004418363,0.0002827548,0.001056947,0.0002478678,0.0001669426,0.001086729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008423654,0.0001214264,0.0003762385,0.002619508,0.0003293894,0.0004154007,0.000686402,0.0002003565,0.0001397271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009065697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000385077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01536849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02173528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998077,0.00006467986,0.00001673077,0.0000252978,0.00004527835,0.00004036714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996272,0.0001037319,0.0001207239,0.00002804228,0.00009291053,0.00002728508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548217,0.00009715019,0.7553384,0.0003890175,0.0001919956,0.0009719759,0.002822738,0.06601798,0.004101572,0.013907,0.001949497,0.1539578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006295762,0.0002191685,0.8982631,0.000419455,0.0001141056,0.0006082953,0.007241781,0.07975509,0.001370162,0.003343669,0.008622367,0.00003638675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851344,0.001691554,0.006954871,0.00009344424,0.00001433862,0.00004253349,0.0008902268,0.00003154064,0.005147003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997052,0.0005646513,0.001683861,0.000004735327,0.000004738137,0.00001106316,0.0003533714,0.000002493729,0.0003230839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03055805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.023299389853707,"score_gpt":0.2616622674941259,"score_spread":0.2383628776404189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}