{"id":"W4365137104","doi":"10.1002/job.2707","title":"Breaking rules yet helpful for all: Beneficial effects of pro‐customer rule breaking on employee outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Organizational commitment; Psychology; Customer retention; Inefficiency; Psychological contract; Business; Service (business); Social psychology; Marketing; Service quality; Economics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003502603,0.0003883592,0.0004598513,0.0004562507,0.000918734,0.00179879,0.0007373122,0.0009918314,0.007013024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01981529,0.0002701895,0.0007223643,0.0003050341,0.001066557,0.0008280381,0.001542833,0.0026294,0.000398036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005656759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00160523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001490881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002883822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973835,0.001413986,0.0001605956,0.0002200342,0.0004171795,0.0004045768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9399655,0.03542985,0.008099327,0.002851781,0.001950156,0.01170341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007585657,0.02228362,0.7561631,0.0006736169,0.001352857,0.0004205385,0.002957986,0.002311576,0.008806815,0.003169117,0.002347838,0.1919273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002378036,0.004784521,0.9851711,0.0001228804,0.0004709661,0.00009717378,0.002087364,0.001393293,0.001826571,0.00248014,0.001281309,0.00004680045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965355,0.0002201316,0.0001604953,0.0006073078,0.00002593961,0.00002141293,0.00003828446,0.00001354498,0.002377517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992181,0.00008644921,0.0002680657,0.0001267577,0.00001948794,0.00001820381,0.00003243682,0.000004431734,0.0002259734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007013024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02346092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01987935694211708,"score_gpt":0.2810222769475137,"score_spread":0.2611429200053967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}