{"id":"W4365152881","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2023.113570","title":"A systematic evaluation of multi-resolution ICESat-2 ATL08 terrain and canopy heights in boreal forests","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Remote sensing; Terrain; Elevation (ballistics); Environmental science; Lidar; Image resolution; Vegetation (pathology); Taiga; Satellite; Canopy; Altimeter; Geology; Geography; Cartography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002408084,0.0004422343,0.0002679512,0.001062885,0.0005207518,0.0007079365,0.0006489574,0.0003331059,0.0002635532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003551733,0.0001850019,0.0003829149,0.001026838,0.0003105839,0.001015273,0.0004136882,0.0002561952,0.0001409457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004894499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03607767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09352914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988351,0.0001714728,0.0001212423,0.0003995599,0.0004002945,0.0000722878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970915,0.000488612,0.000595232,0.0004519655,0.001258096,0.0001146001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001526498,0.0001221871,0.907167,0.0001781611,0.0002511267,0.0001197239,0.0004487212,0.0092972,0.01490683,0.0002822838,0.001787098,0.06528714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001001672,0.00006550182,0.9815545,0.00004274374,0.00006324193,0.0001475151,0.000264603,0.01158423,0.003659545,0.00006979179,0.00251809,0.00002031735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877101,0.001099964,0.005536892,0.00007831034,0.00004972138,0.00004110576,0.002776969,0.0003188707,0.002388132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869608,0.0002330862,0.008677455,0.00005952187,0.00001926776,0.00002286415,0.003732187,0.00004625702,0.0002486226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03607767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07173538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02576544409067115,"score_gpt":0.2692914023891869,"score_spread":0.2435259582985157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}