{"id":"W4366249477","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2022-0155","title":"Vibration analysis of a cracked beam using the finite element method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Health Monitoring Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Subharmonic function; Beam (structure); Structural engineering; Finite element method; Vibration; Stiffness matrix; Stiffness; Bending stiffness; Bending; Harmonic; Natural frequency; Acoustics; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002994016,0.0003637563,0.0003687548,0.0003719353,0.0002221752,0.0002867917,0.0006183859,0.0008103182,0.001963361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005094565,0.0002309478,0.0004462269,0.0002035775,0.0003239809,0.0004059101,0.000302204,0.0003985513,0.0003677333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002025164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004286038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002414225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001473666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998702,0.00003394954,0.000007052331,0.00001744138,0.00006027173,0.00001109963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998419,0.0000912649,0.00001150334,0.00001402108,0.00003548916,0.000005631121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136458,0.00006646798,0.00118347,0.0001394976,0.00004145844,0.0001565267,0.000188098,0.8484586,0.08759287,0.01016846,0.0003630991,0.05158005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002680229,0.00001412695,0.0001452742,0.000004665134,0.000001962742,0.00001657042,0.000007422075,0.9975222,0.001475977,0.0004139516,0.0003918744,0.000003298395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02960475,0.000139345,0.9679492,0.0000464427,0.00001731182,0.0000326095,0.0000423008,0.0001662993,0.00200165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6445601,0.0004015137,0.34889,0.00005111976,0.00001613345,0.0002300037,0.0001338814,0.00006544437,0.005651685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002414225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006568074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02916785940184639,"score_gpt":0.2941331594233852,"score_spread":0.2649653000215388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}