{"id":"W4366384048","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0021.014","title":"Collectif pour un Québec sans pauvreté : un processus d’évaluation continue des « fruits » obtenus et des « chemins » parcourus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Valuation (finance); Poverty; Welfare economics; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Economics; Law; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06492337,0.0007296886,0.0005260668,0.00238162,0.009002067,0.005152779,0.001427434,0.001240507,0.002858694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03361426,0.0004634117,0.0003796165,0.00233738,0.002287232,0.001452399,0.002611418,0.001822227,0.0002156136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04672226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1317443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8126798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9756213,0.01599594,0.0004948677,0.0008765974,0.005846538,0.001164653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545217,0.009834375,0.001614645,0.001360671,0.02799843,0.004670111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001422051,0.004954983,0.09070717,0.001794333,0.0003348707,0.002323881,0.181412,0.008140705,0.01329939,0.028298,0.06164249,0.6056702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006442015,0.006275291,0.3643728,0.003655171,0.000286034,0.0004352991,0.2202048,0.01956371,0.02094993,0.006000083,0.3570311,0.0005815189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8547599,0.002840905,0.03730103,0.01868987,0.0002987661,0.01740928,0.001341063,0.0003187284,0.06704056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911833,0.0009847053,0.06074458,0.0009485437,0.00003333157,0.00337574,0.0006196189,0.00008236215,0.0213781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1873202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3768468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1153642430009241,"score_gpt":0.3937034130125219,"score_spread":0.2783391700115977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}