{"id":"W4366384165","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.21.001","title":"Suggestions d’améliorations d’un cadre conceptuel de l’évaluation participative","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory evaluation; Empowerment; Stakeholder; Citizen journalism; Relevance (law); Valuation (finance); Sociology; Knowledge management; Management science; Process management; Business; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Social science; Engineering; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3847707,0.004243354,0.002821813,0.01324568,0.008372976,0.03198486,0.009666139,0.01363512,0.007060355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2933479,0.002038539,0.004210293,0.008134787,0.03493218,0.04194219,0.01209893,0.01736334,0.002599017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02295186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05301825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01467904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01587354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5686244,0.3609556,0.02098216,0.007097156,0.03861604,0.003724615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5962744,0.2363735,0.0139918,0.02414494,0.1218927,0.007322537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003643065,0.0007190278,0.002687809,0.005914642,0.0001672831,0.0005482737,0.03083374,0.004291665,0.002299186,0.7141219,0.02588119,0.212171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008367629,0.0007830011,0.004424693,0.02134981,0.0003215668,0.001476836,0.045337,0.02659245,0.005329933,0.3921775,0.5006663,0.0007043228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009620108,0.01149402,0.7234622,0.221049,0.004438373,0.006293975,0.0001649587,0.0009918385,0.02248545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1033574,0.005423062,0.8620447,0.00950015,0.000921891,0.01214096,0.0002316656,0.0002535507,0.006126661],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7586873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3522063354619847,"score_gpt":0.5249077562850959,"score_spread":0.1727014208231112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}