{"id":"W4366384172","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0024.005","title":"Rigour and Feasibility in Tobacco Control Evaluation: Toward a Successful Reconciliation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Communications and Information Technology Ontario; Heart and Stroke Foundation; University of Waterloo; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Stakeholder; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Tobacco control; Control (management); Plan (archaeology); Management science; Program evaluation; Process management; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Medicine; Public health; Epistemology; Nursing; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07160067,0.0001469476,0.0003180493,0.0008249185,0.0002218369,0.0005462925,0.0003851185,0.0001504528,0.00423498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01691462,0.0001191044,0.00009561449,0.0008217563,0.0001224604,0.001219274,0.00001025678,0.0006319979,0.00004293813],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005497725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007578838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009988707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1816677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934024,0.001780528,0.00133316,0.0003279183,0.00285614,0.0002998127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923266,0.0006028806,0.000841405,0.000349631,0.005392734,0.0004867782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002397407,0.00002849496,0.4936072,0.000002055176,0.000007763319,0.000001545584,0.0008486235,0.0005201587,0.00005989581,0.0001283468,0.0002606644,0.5045113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003238206,0.0002577817,0.848574,0.00002411116,0.00007724069,0.00003843778,0.001356351,0.1252883,0.00003976549,0.0157944,0.005165021,0.0001463495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891412,0.0002864372,0.000303397,0.005145354,0.001328125,0.002073204,0.000008879771,0.00000654278,0.001706855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978325,0.000006655799,0.001551848,0.0002196737,0.0002201644,0.0001220383,0.000009854979,0.000007520446,0.00002978898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5043649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3731323469418839,"score_gpt":0.5320879190308285,"score_spread":0.1589555720889447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}