{"id":"W4366384172","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0024.005","title":"Rigour and Feasibility in Tobacco Control Evaluation: Toward a Successful Reconciliation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Communications and Information Technology Ontario; Heart and Stroke Foundation; University of Waterloo; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Stakeholder; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Tobacco control; Control (management); Plan (archaeology); Management science; Program evaluation; Process management; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Medicine; Public health; Epistemology; Nursing; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.8542895,0.002455489,0.005300167,0.01631117,0.01189424,0.03836698,0.00957213,0.01272317,0.002666954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8375267,0.003585883,0.003819232,0.009978873,0.05445308,0.03452598,0.03963463,0.01734254,0.0006355628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03401669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08559014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004479147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004681074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.05663212,0.8443934,0.03070839,0.00672439,0.0594641,0.002077758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08857952,0.7135817,0.0415962,0.0735992,0.07854608,0.004097336],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009924883,0.0007521068,0.01093691,0.008974115,0.001319494,0.0004859063,0.04142318,0.00923504,0.001400661,0.4841944,0.009823225,0.4304625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001201198,0.002171349,0.01145966,0.02582687,0.0008343076,0.0007119417,0.01353529,0.02037454,0.005152559,0.8231656,0.09478112,0.0007855067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02987268,0.02040678,0.6582823,0.2328837,0.002444507,0.009525017,0.0001514187,0.0005725681,0.04586096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4675425,0.003330344,0.5080053,0.009958536,0.001129957,0.007989422,0.0001002183,0.0002281967,0.00171552],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2468096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3731323469418839,"score_gpt":0.5320879190308285,"score_spread":0.1589555720889447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}