{"id":"W4366448482","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.020.005","title":"The Delphi Technique as a Method for Increasing Inclusion in the Evaluation Process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delphi method; Delphi; Compromise; Inclusion (mineral); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Evaluation methods; Psychology; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Public relations; Management science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1891226,0.0001308472,0.0001877721,0.0005886743,0.001220381,0.0006664667,0.001067328,0.00009939401,0.0002623583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01875096,0.00007047594,0.0001257412,0.001180838,0.00007494464,0.0007575926,0.00004232506,0.0002864145,0.00001338475],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007992775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006280525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05213422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898994,0.003581483,0.001287675,0.0002357102,0.004642139,0.0003535981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991171,0.00218325,0.0009108325,0.0003463913,0.005207561,0.0001809668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005281939,0.00003220536,0.0008700857,0.000002726985,0.000007951707,5.379457e-7,0.005155796,0.00598011,0.00008232221,0.0005739133,0.0005906152,0.9866509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001548652,0.0005961659,0.01440502,0.00009347479,0.0001404915,0.0001616433,0.007122014,0.7008614,0.0004952725,0.1824598,0.09194803,0.0001680684],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7846106,0.003387119,0.07454904,0.1030093,0.001137514,0.02417315,0.00001156022,0.00002648515,0.009095257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740414,0.00001186715,0.02354275,0.000714045,0.0002856642,0.001363523,0.000009716074,0.00001002617,0.00002097967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3689523270921288,"score_gpt":0.6178187315297932,"score_spread":0.2488664044376644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}