{"id":"W4366449208","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.23.011","title":"L’examen de la qualité des évaluations fédérales: une méta-évaluation réussie?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Treasury; Valuation (finance); Quality (philosophy); Relevance (law); Political science; Psychology; Accounting; Business; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6752882,0.002779198,0.01500532,0.02082706,0.002980161,0.02116052,0.007963373,0.005497147,0.002805695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8506874,0.003466078,0.01930771,0.0217247,0.009118379,0.01910389,0.006734822,0.0081061,0.0004035423],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02253944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02461415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01439345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01808697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2192968,0.6183816,0.08684938,0.009819954,0.06416585,0.001486356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07388981,0.7753016,0.04830047,0.06028513,0.04139164,0.0008314764],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003318288,0.0002566147,0.02763932,0.2423012,0.2977568,0.0002645094,0.004959663,0.003709355,0.001216027,0.04545237,0.0148976,0.3582284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002729904,0.001851087,0.03490398,0.5311134,0.2586255,0.0008579791,0.003313433,0.01012147,0.005769342,0.07452521,0.07553737,0.00065124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01191604,0.8736547,0.05976979,0.04328072,0.00444614,0.001748428,0.0008600979,0.0002303583,0.004093755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5841991,0.2138241,0.16561,0.02015616,0.005775628,0.007685983,0.0009853799,0.0005739366,0.001189748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4004275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5449930809225783,"score_gpt":0.5670762013901169,"score_spread":0.02208312046753869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}