{"id":"W4366495377","doi":"10.15562/phytomedicine.2022.188","title":"Phytochemical Screening and in vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Lawsonia Inermis Barks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discovery Phytomedicine - Journal of Natural Products Research and Ethnopharmacology","topic":"Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsonia inermis; Phytochemical; Antimicrobial; Traditional medicine; Agar diffusion test; Antibacterial activity; Punica; Biology; Chemistry; Microbiology; Medicine; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00282547,0.0002296936,0.0006721047,0.0008778945,0.0001758664,0.00002541471,0.0003038528,0.0002234346,0.00002832984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005661188,0.0001806724,0.00006943221,0.001296422,0.001491522,0.0004997163,0.0003387484,0.00281413,0.000002286746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005592976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001851245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002601757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003739019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972431,0.0006861718,0.0005419613,0.0003877581,0.0004243572,0.000716619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.000877331,0.0002795763,0.0001152284,0.0004967039,0.0002333905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0078004,0.0003413454,0.004228735,0.0003345674,0.0001939056,0.0004398062,0.0002739135,0.00001595527,0.9638615,0.000007021386,0.009946489,0.01255633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005341265,0.0005568217,0.03602441,0.0001295516,0.00006195722,0.0001875769,0.0001717236,0.0007512879,0.9533446,0.0001347524,0.003114173,0.0001818251],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872462,0.003533292,0.000005481826,0.007702203,0.001057584,0.0003232779,0.00003987985,0.00001281711,0.00007931908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944253,0.004064769,0.00009418312,0.0003146541,0.0008009104,0.000005695229,0.00001340816,0.00001924748,0.0002618333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03179568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.183805724848562,"score_gpt":0.4914603386590012,"score_spread":0.3076546138104392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}