{"id":"W4368353648","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101407","title":"Regional flood frequency analysis based on peaks-over-threshold approach: A case study for South-Eastern Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Flood myth; Ordinary least squares; Range (aeronautics); Estimation; Statistics; Surface runoff; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Computer science; Econometrics; Geography; Mathematics; Geology; Engineering; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001546836,0.0003577566,0.001005061,0.0006789256,0.0005261253,0.0000195734,0.0004350443,0.0001879044,0.000161821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001267269,0.0002721223,0.0008806348,0.001526476,0.0006212564,0.0001728042,0.0001403842,0.0004269349,0.0001129165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001406034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003043881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001745128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000751165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970419,0.0002860694,0.0008386152,0.0005749291,0.0007111178,0.0005473236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981892,0.0004969477,0.0006694733,0.0003717381,0.00009133208,0.0001813627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004994937,0.0008347555,0.7914732,0.00001234471,0.005991791,0.003544668,0.002900848,0.1828754,0.00003134937,0.00005558556,0.01173176,0.00004889879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01816636,0.01423835,0.4327686,0.00006680803,0.02874384,0.006902077,0.02757776,0.4513601,0.0000229785,0.01265325,0.005051454,0.002448435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960505,0.0001811435,0.00060697,0.00249613,0.0001521193,0.000300195,0.00001269757,0.00004261911,0.0001575802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975429,0.00002684113,0.0006304628,0.0008725447,0.000263121,0.0000671489,0.0000124983,0.00002448771,0.0005599611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3587046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1065921652179029,"score_gpt":0.338945374912667,"score_spread":0.2323532096947641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}