{"id":"W4372202772","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.005","title":"A Simplified Method to Minimize Systematic Bias of Single-Optimized Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intraocular lens; Keratometer; Refraction; Lens (geology); Mathematics; Exponential function; Position (finance); Cataracts; Intraocular lens power calculation; Constant (computer programming); Power (physics); Optics; Ophthalmology; Medicine; Cornea; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001694501,0.0002564417,0.001933777,0.0007583182,0.00007032278,0.000007497487,0.0001782105,0.0001145479,0.000108268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001633742,0.0001936905,0.0004048941,0.00103877,0.0002792292,0.00009885598,0.00009362085,0.0002463853,0.00004007668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008878014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001057025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002598138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.737536e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969169,0.0007052004,0.001336629,0.0002384971,0.0003718173,0.0004308877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964681,0.001307859,0.00121447,0.0002984014,0.0005027885,0.0002083386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0429645,0.01016163,0.4864255,0.01977413,0.02180183,0.03832781,0.02331271,0.01296139,0.3327239,0.001265223,0.007105074,0.003176256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01649069,0.1255084,0.5404831,0.00864098,0.004816447,0.2673452,0.01452912,0.001779079,0.01772205,0.001116739,0.0001514327,0.001416797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900631,0.0001427729,0.006954439,0.00132696,0.000305709,0.0005542968,0.000005754701,0.00002465989,0.0006223178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696106,0.0000112137,0.02978381,0.0002094572,0.00006658345,0.00001866223,0.000004610746,0.00003356256,0.000261497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3150019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7898471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08261335856740035,"score_gpt":0.3944380038701685,"score_spread":0.3118246453027681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}