{"id":"W4375846933","doi":"10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104460","title":"Nonstationary hydrological frequency analysis using the Metastatistical extreme value distribution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Water Resources","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Overfitting; Generalized extreme value distribution; Extreme value theory; Benchmark (surveying); Sample (material); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003318438,0.0001661405,0.0001993912,0.0006661713,0.0002435615,0.0004094462,0.0002446315,0.0001537084,0.0009298836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001443295,0.0001191187,0.0002949256,0.0006438071,0.0001672018,0.000783357,0.0004000743,0.0003782704,0.000108822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001473872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000230548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001521536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00218235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999205,0.00002506793,0.000006096249,0.00001677293,0.0000212749,0.00001039796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994281,0.0003822622,0.00007080371,0.00005068295,0.00004757718,0.00002064573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003376109,0.000184059,0.04534221,0.00007576535,0.0002563377,0.0004216283,0.0002008657,0.4841645,0.03464311,0.07111047,0.001575647,0.3616878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005245798,0.0000132047,0.005862996,0.00000151879,0.000005930277,0.00003859086,0.000009634155,0.983798,0.0006495642,0.009381925,0.0002273521,0.000006135574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1767589,0.00008004039,0.822011,0.00006150068,0.00001393272,0.00001297315,0.0001269133,0.0001991739,0.0007356451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390682,0.00006226912,0.05994576,0.00001444523,0.00003055046,0.00001934521,0.0002334786,0.00004252724,0.0005835039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001521536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003110826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01964223652216222,"score_gpt":0.2756543246802899,"score_spread":0.2560120881581277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}