{"id":"W4377720571","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4457626","title":"Public Opinion on the Conflict between the Conservation of At-Risk Species and the Extraction of Natural Resources: The Case of Caribou in Boreal Forest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Natural resource; Natural (archaeology); Taiga; Public opinion; Extraction (chemistry); Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Political science; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology; Chemistry; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006299373,0.0001873081,0.0002659363,0.00004895728,0.0004387065,0.0000357733,0.0005701146,0.000172252,0.00001641081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000311418,0.00008297452,0.000158341,0.0001808192,0.001865553,0.00009117458,0.0005256553,0.003961347,0.000002122073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005455934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001113327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01150525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02669036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974347,0.0007970015,0.0005606501,0.0002122353,0.0004769792,0.0005184148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967546,0.001762129,0.001010815,0.0004293788,0.00001701055,0.00002603622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001354327,0.0002024683,0.6743095,0.0001196881,0.0009267303,0.0000154837,0.01839551,0.009462992,0.0005380632,0.2849778,0.0005283447,0.009169093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008575806,0.0002241283,0.6912935,0.0001086917,0.0001056406,0.0002678263,0.006240166,0.001140019,0.0002590651,0.2984284,0.0009186344,0.0001564051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786516,0.001146236,0.00004373901,0.01871457,0.0001391842,0.0004849261,0.00005508055,0.000004542646,0.0007601651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892899,0.01035546,0.000003758156,0.00008270013,0.0001340746,0.0000147059,0.00002013471,0.00001557387,0.00008368491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01863187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05626633710188068,"score_gpt":0.2706824149620254,"score_spread":0.2144160778601448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}