{"id":"W4377823037","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2023.1194895","title":"From vision toward best practices: Evaluating in vitro transcriptomic points of departure for application in risk assessment using a uniform workflow","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Toxicology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Relevance (law); Hazard; Hazard analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Data science; Biochemical engineering; Reliability engineering; Database; Biology; Engineering; Business; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06172678,0.002107433,0.002098855,0.004717854,0.002307211,0.01220851,0.003289471,0.002376712,0.00185644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06305227,0.001317344,0.00285312,0.003682378,0.003544377,0.004418421,0.006780841,0.004822503,0.002125852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006142937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01306018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005068162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01125453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9635593,0.01303316,0.003878974,0.00819274,0.0103237,0.001012095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463274,0.01421881,0.005032372,0.01575819,0.01688532,0.001777857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002092784,0.001188148,0.04358916,0.005826109,0.001447256,0.0008767056,0.008604865,0.0278514,0.4702858,0.03104237,0.01281214,0.3943834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003788683,0.003274944,0.04827682,0.003379027,0.001403046,0.001098736,0.009358709,0.06615605,0.5757193,0.1071129,0.1827927,0.001048986],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07699161,0.003592482,0.8900506,0.003696705,0.0005531102,0.003375771,0.005494812,0.00600732,0.01023752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09307513,0.001665946,0.8934868,0.001325947,0.00008104313,0.002868843,0.005244294,0.001124076,0.001127914],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06172678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3264463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03774847260725796,"score_gpt":0.42392819006966,"score_spread":0.3861797174624021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}