{"id":"W4378085304","doi":"10.3390/en16114279","title":"Unique Symbolic Factorization for Fast Contingency Analysis Using Full Newton–Raphson Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Factorization; Jacobian matrix and determinant; Solver; Matrix decomposition; Computation; Electric power system; Newton's method; Symbolic computation; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Power (physics); Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001772575,0.0001459867,0.000222305,0.0003435561,0.00008284623,0.00005399071,0.00009415827,0.00009398234,0.00002435158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007481105,0.000160106,0.0001464931,0.001474208,0.00001133115,0.0001729372,0.00002334723,0.00005996347,0.000008258031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008214688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004442546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003242039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992118,0.00002921661,0.0002073331,0.0001748593,0.0001101133,0.0002666422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.00008256337,0.00003946297,0.0001669837,0.00009172835,0.00004288877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004572917,0.000004037777,0.0006289147,0.00003281842,0.0002127338,6.241468e-7,0.0002177487,0.9273995,0.06775122,0.002058713,0.0004774316,0.001211647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574476,0.00002340187,0.0036549,0.000009117589,0.0002841148,4.784844e-7,0.0002365517,0.9427686,0.04917405,0.0002869031,0.003169132,0.0002352801],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4146383,0.00006932165,0.5840054,0.00001608729,0.0002927778,0.00009081768,0.00008244366,0.0005903474,0.0002145582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872358,0.00004613322,0.01183158,0.000005103286,0.0001216343,0.00003187183,0.0005449154,0.00003738952,0.0001455014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5725976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6528932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0188742085100333,"score_gpt":0.2910862120486449,"score_spread":0.2722120035386116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}