{"id":"W4378085304","doi":"10.3390/en16114279","title":"Unique Symbolic Factorization for Fast Contingency Analysis Using Full Newton–Raphson Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Factorization; Jacobian matrix and determinant; Solver; Matrix decomposition; Computation; Electric power system; Newton's method; Symbolic computation; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Power (physics); Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003824155,0.0008029592,0.000604848,0.0004911705,0.00046446,0.0005198729,0.0005362654,0.0005194843,0.006298617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001107111,0.0002684237,0.0005937738,0.0004620932,0.0004798074,0.0006378155,0.0005916164,0.0009625169,0.001262609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003942788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004283255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004664405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998247,0.00005624399,0.000006556681,0.0000173071,0.00007213983,0.00002306037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997166,0.0001363458,0.00002929422,0.00003000365,0.00007160148,0.00001616185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009073485,0.00006658187,0.0007645302,0.0002576119,0.00003637015,0.0003337193,0.0002295945,0.7626141,0.01071548,0.07817977,0.004937433,0.141774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006874731,0.00001220182,0.0000490837,0.000006797283,0.000002717421,0.00002483255,0.00001266315,0.9929953,0.0006118646,0.004542597,0.001730966,0.000004050015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006943393,0.0001612958,0.9872555,0.0001018609,0.00004323228,0.00004161836,0.00004551122,0.000324317,0.005083293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2997635,0.0004767189,0.6930305,0.00009284656,0.00007092635,0.0002336616,0.0001913527,0.0002623331,0.005878177],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006298617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02107102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0188742085100333,"score_gpt":0.2910862120486449,"score_spread":0.2722120035386116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}