{"id":"W4378212446","doi":"10.1186/s13019-023-02284-4","title":"The 100 most cited papers on total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","topic":"Congenital Heart Disease Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Annals; Citation analysis; Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Cardiothoracic surgery; Science Citation Index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Library science; Surgery; History; Classics; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009831523,0.000960664,0.002788164,0.1709863,0.001622075,0.005427723,0.001310127,0.00102963,0.004385842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04928542,0.0003604635,0.003175795,0.1625354,0.0009589631,0.00371482,0.002215241,0.0005656799,0.001136012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002648782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00373244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003092937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003467473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860449,0.001877726,0.003707233,0.001083782,0.006800404,0.0004860416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589586,0.02189972,0.00811513,0.0009527683,0.009118358,0.000955513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000804178,0.0002870579,0.5321168,0.04768332,0.006299584,0.002170566,0.004643241,0.002844125,0.00295415,0.003829438,0.02494861,0.371419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002301418,0.000580067,0.8475816,0.01276866,0.009958029,0.005913476,0.01005836,0.008742798,0.00363243,0.00978711,0.09036695,0.0003802072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7226928,0.1745366,0.006478787,0.004028276,0.0007528483,0.002409917,0.05906662,0.000686952,0.02934718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8708667,0.0874619,0.01445753,0.0002797355,0.0007624882,0.001749971,0.02167274,0.0001082397,0.002640677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8290138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05199468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02902978174844872,"score_gpt":0.3103510343434568,"score_spread":0.2813212525950081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}