{"id":"W4378904308","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2023.2216503","title":"Assessing inequity in zoning bylaw: a case of Edmonton, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zoning; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Environmental planning; Scholarship; Land use; Economic growth; Geography; Law; Economics; Civil engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001916558,0.0003967862,0.0004489883,0.002067679,0.03457322,0.004705345,0.002343723,0.002132206,0.003638826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004710661,0.0003608471,0.0004542408,0.004911216,0.006706289,0.001306049,0.004554118,0.003320971,0.0001121392],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1626461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1371649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965758,0.000587196,0.00006475361,0.0002172072,0.0007599163,0.00179513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971301,0.0006674317,0.0001823017,0.0001267578,0.0009778637,0.0009155018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001455374,0.0003492772,0.1864142,0.0003701862,0.0001215693,0.02847064,0.3753341,0.005595234,0.001637561,0.2921402,0.03854768,0.07087385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003766843,0.00006884937,0.1297749,0.0006289256,0.0001292104,0.002414411,0.6946824,0.005574898,0.0007601604,0.01235035,0.1534266,0.0001517778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899553,0.001611526,0.001471506,0.01742272,0.00007524804,0.0001720865,0.0003247219,0.00002312726,0.08894372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866691,0.000742859,0.0009823438,0.001383545,0.000009216762,0.00002924054,0.00007394517,0.00001124957,0.01009856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1626461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2260790559340394,"score_gpt":0.5334955588860906,"score_spread":0.3074165029520511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}